By the late 1990s, concepts of risk and risk assessment have been employed to inform decision-making for the management of food safety risks. Modern food safety policies are intended to be risk-based (Koutsoumanis and Aspridou 2016).The framework for carrying out risk assessments of foodborne pathogens is well established (Microbiological Risk Assessment Guidelines for Food 2021) and relies on four components including hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment and risk characterization Figure 1.1.
If the QMRA approach is well structured, the method used by the risk assessor can vary. One may adopt qualitative and/or quantitative method. It may consider determnisitic or stochastic
The QMRA approach can help to answer various questions. For examples, (Mota et al. 2022) identified the following objectives:
evaluation of illness risk,
assessment of interventions,
simple exposure assessment,
or risk ranking.
Each objective is associated to specific starting point (farm, food industry, retail,…), output (score or risk, mean annual risk, DALY,…) and data needs.
One of the main challenge is to identify the appropriate approach to tackle the risk question. In this context, EJP OH COHESIVE proposes a decision support tool to help risk assessor: COHESIVE Decision Support Tool. The tool helps to define the best approach according to the objective and time available.
Once the approach has been chosen, the main challenge is to gather data. Different types of data can be collected (microbial concentrations, daily consumption, etc.). The collected data should be fit for purpose, representative and allow a meaningful analysis (Haberbeck et al. 2018).
Our goal is to provide an help to identify data/knowledge that risk assessors and data scientists need at the start of their projects.
This is the first release (September 2022) of the “Guide for accessing relevant data and models for quantitative microbial risk assessment”. The document is uploaded in Zenodo, lastest relase can be find here: . This document will be maintained by authors according to the sustainability plan of CARE. All stakeholders, including students, researchers,risk assessment teams, are encouraged to use this document. This document is always a work in progress and everyone is encouraged to help us build something that is useful to the many.
Haberbeck, Leticia Ungaretti, Carolina Plaza-Rodríguez, Virginie Desvignes, Paw Dalgaard, Moez Sanaa, Laurent Guillier, Maarten Nauta, and Matthias Filter. 2018.
“Harmonized Terms, Concepts and Metadata for Microbiological Risk Assessment Models: The Basis for Knowledge Integration and Exchange.” Microbial Risk Analysis 10: 3–12. https://doi.org/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2018.06.001.
Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos P, and Zafiro Aspridou. 2016.
“Moving Towards a Risk-Based Food Safety Management.” Current Opinion in Food Science 12 (December): 36–41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2016.06.008.
Microbiological Risk Assessment Guidelines for Food. 2021. FAO; WHO.
https://doi.org/10.4060/cb5006en.
Mota, Juliana De Oliveira, Laurent Guillier, Henk Aarts, and Virginie Desvignes. 2022.
“Deliverable D.4.1.3. Report on the survey related to the availability and quality of data used for risk assessment.” Zenodo.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5882651.